Home » Posts tagged "united-states" (Page 2)

Posts Tagged ‘united-states’:


Cuba says blogger Yoani Sanchez part of "cyberwar"

Published by in Uncategorized on March 21st, 2011 | Comments Off

HAVANA |
Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:21am EDT

HAVANA (Reuters) – Cuba attacked dissident blogger Yoani Sanchez in a nationally televised program on Monday, accusing of her being part of a “cyberwar” against the communist island by the United States and other enemies.

The program, the latest in a series called “Cuba’s Reasons,” showed Sanchez in grainy videos entering the U.S. Interests Section in Havana and European embassies.

Sanchez, whose “Generation Y” blog is read internationally, was portrayed as part of a massive “media campaign” against Cuba, which the program said has tried to “demonize” socialism.

In return, she has collected a total of $500,000 in international prizes for her work, the program said. Her blog criticizes Cuba’s government and the state of the country.

“Cyberwar is not a war of bombs and bullets, but of information, communication, algorithms and bytes. It is the new form of invasion that has originated in the developed world,” said the narrator.

Sanchez, who previously has said she was physically attacked by government agents, appeared to take the program in stride.

“I am so happy. Finally the alternative blogosphere on official television, although it’s to insult us,” she said on Twitter.

The “Cuba’s Reasons” series has tried to show that the United States is using new technologies to try to subvert the Cuban government.

It has coincided with the trial and conviction of U.S. aid contractor Alan Gross, who has been jailed since December 2009 for allegedly trying to bring the Internet to government opponents.

He was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a panel of judges in a case that has strained U.S.-Cuba relations.

(Reporting by Jeff Franks; Editing by Eric Beech)

Read the original here:



Obama offers new U.S. partnership with Latin America

Published by in Uncategorized on March 21st, 2011 | Comments Off

By Matt Spetalnick and Simon Gardner

SANTIAGO |
Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:44pm EDT

SANTIAGO (Reuters) – President Barack Obama called on Monday for a “new era of partnership” with Latin America as he acknowledged a sometimes troubled past between Washington and its neighbors in the region.

But his mission to reassert Washington’s influence south of the border was punctuated by questions over the U.S. role in fierce air assaults over Libya, and aides scrambled to keep him up to speed on the attacks in between talks with heads of state and policy speeches.

Following a weekend visit to Latin America’s powerhouse Brazil, Obama laid out a vision for deeper trade, investment and political ties with an economically dynamic region where the United States faces growing competition from China.

“No region is more closely linked than the United States and Latin America,” Obama told reporters after meeting Chilean President Sebastian Pinera in Santiago on Monday.

Still, there have been no major initiatives and the visit has been overshadowed by the air strikes against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Obama is struggling to balance his handling of world crises, including U.S. military intervention in a third Muslim country, with his domestic priorities of jobs and the economy, considered crucial to his 2012 re-election chances.

In his speech on Latin America, Obama hailed the transition in Chile and other Latin American countries to stable democracy from military dictatorship as a model for Arab states swept by popular rebellions against autocratic rule.

“There are no senior partners and there are no junior partners, there are equal partners” in the U.S.-Latin American relationship, Obama said, adding that had to be a “two-way” street in terms of shouldering responsibilities.

He conceded that relations have “at times been very rocky and at times been difficult,” but said it was important to learn from history and “not be trapped by it.”

The United States regularly imposed its will on Latin America in the 20th century and, during the Cold War, it backed a series of right-wing dictatorships against Marxist rebels or left-wing groups. They included the dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet in Chile.

GROWING IMPORTANCE TO U.S.

Obama said Latin America, where growth has outstripped the U.S. recovery and democracy has taken hold after brutal civil wars, is now more important to U.S. prosperity than ever.

But he offered no major policy changes or initiatives and was short on specifics about how to advance the partnership beyond laying out themes of improved cooperation on trade, clean energy, security and anti-drug efforts.

He lauded Chile’s economic success story and promised U.S. cooperation in an investigation of human rights crimes under military rule, but he sidestepped a question on whether he would apologize for what human rights groups allege was U.S. backing for the 1973 coup that brought Pinochet to power.

While praising the advances made, Obama — on what his team billed as his signature tour of the region — said some Latin American leaders are still clinging to “bankrupt ideologies” and called on communist-ruled Cuba to respect human rights.

Obama is popular in Latin America but there is a sense among its leaders that relations have been neglected while he battles urgent domestic challenges and foreign wars. China, in the meantime, has deepened its influence in the region by rapidly expanding trade and investment.

Read the original here:



Obama offers new U.S. partnership with Latin America (Reuters)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 21st, 2011 | Comments Off

SANTIAGO (Reuters) – President Barack Obama called on Monday for a “new era of partnership” with Latin America as he acknowledged a sometimes troubled past between Washington and its neighbors in the region.

But his mission to reassert Washington’s influence south of the border was punctuated by questions over the U.S. role in fierce air assaults over Libya, and aides scrambled to keep him up to speed on the attacks in between talks with heads of state and policy speeches.

Following a weekend visit to Latin America’s powerhouse Brazil, Obama laid out a vision for deeper trade, investment and political ties with an economically dynamic region where the United States faces growing competition from China.

“No region is more closely linked than the United States and Latin America,” Obama told reporters after meeting Chilean President Sebastian Pinera in Santiago on Monday.

Still, there have been no major initiatives and the visit has been overshadowed by the air strikes against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Obama is struggling to balance his handling of world crises, including U.S. military intervention in a third Muslim country, with his domestic priorities of jobs and the economy, considered crucial to his 2012 re-election chances.

In his speech on Latin America, Obama hailed the transition in Chile and other Latin American countries to stable democracy from military dictatorship as a model for Arab states swept by popular rebellions against autocratic rule.

“There are no senior partners and there are no junior partners, there are equal partners” in the U.S.-Latin American relationship, Obama said, adding that had to be a “two-way” street in terms of shouldering responsibilities.

He conceded that relations have “at times been very rocky and at times been difficult,” but said it was important to learn from history and “not be trapped by it.”

The United States regularly imposed its will on Latin America in the 20th century and, during the Cold War, it backed a series of right-wing dictatorships against Marxist rebels or left-wing groups. They included the dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet in Chile.

GROWING IMPORTANCE TO U.S.

Obama said Latin America, where growth has outstripped the U.S. recovery and democracy has taken hold after brutal civil wars, is now more important to U.S. prosperity than ever.

But he offered no major policy changes or initiatives and was short on specifics about how to advance the partnership beyond laying out themes of improved cooperation on trade, clean energy, security and anti-drug efforts.

He lauded Chile’s economic success story and promised U.S. cooperation in an investigation of human rights crimes under military rule, but he sidestepped a question on whether he would apologize for what human rights groups allege was U.S. backing for the 1973 coup that brought Pinochet to power.

While praising the advances made, Obama — on what his team billed as his signature tour of the region — said some Latin American leaders are still clinging to “bankrupt ideologies” and called on communist-ruled Cuba to respect human rights.

Obama is popular in Latin America but there is a sense among its leaders that relations have been neglected while he battles urgent domestic challenges and foreign wars. China, in the meantime, has deepened its influence in the region by rapidly expanding trade and investment.

“I know that, at times, the United States has taken this region for granted,” Obama said.

Many Latin Americans are disappointed that Obama has not taken significant steps to ease the longstanding U.S. embargo on Cuba. He made no promises to do so in Monday’s speech, saying any further steps would require Cuba to first take “meaningful actions” on granting rights to its people.

Obama made no direct reference to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the most vocally anti-U.S. leader in the region.

Pinera backed Obama’s call for a new alliance, but reminded him that Panama and Colombia are still waiting for long-promised free trade agreements with the United States.

In Brazil, Obama signed a series of trade and energy deals but also found himself in the awkward position of meeting a leader, President Dilma Rousseff, whose government abstained in last week’s U.N. Security Council resolution giving the go-ahead for the strikes on Libya.

Go here to read the rest:
Obama offers new U.S. partnership with Latin America
(Reuters)



Gunfire and explosions rock Tripoli for 3rd night (Reuters)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 21st, 2011 | Comments Off

TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Anti-aircraft fire and explosions reverberated across Tripoli for a third night on Monday and state television said several sites had come under attack in the capital.

Western powers had no immediate confirmation they had launched fresh strikes on Tripoli in a campaign to target Libyan air defenses and enforce a no-fly zone.

A U.S. general said, however, that attacks on Libya — launched in a U.N. mandated operation to stop attacks on civilians by Muammar Gaddafi’s forces — were likely to slow in the coming days.

Despite the campaign, residents in two besieged rebel-held western cities, Misrata and Zintan, said they had been attacked by government troops, some of whom were expected to try to force their way into civilian areas to escape attack from the air.

Rebels, who had been driven back toward their eastern Benghazi stronghold before the air attacks halted an advance by Gaddafi’s forces, have so far done little to capitalize on the campaign, raising fears the war could grind to a stalemate.

Washington, wary of being drawn into another war after long campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, has ruled out specific action to overthrow Gaddafi, although France said on Monday it hoped the Libyan government would collapse from within.

“My sense is that, that unless something unusual or unexpected happens, we may see a decline in the frequency of attacks,” General Carter Ham, who is leading U.S. forces in the Libyan operation, told reporters in Washington.

He added, however, that “we possess the capability to bring overwhelming combat power to bear, as we have done in the initial stages of this, where it’s been required.”

Libyan state television reported that several sites in Tripoli had been subjected to new attacks by what it called the “crusader enemy.”

“These attacks are not going to scare the Libyan people,” state television said.

Anti-aircraft gunfire rang out throughout the night and pro-Gaddafi slogans echoed around the city center. Cars sped through Tripoli streets honking wildly.

Al Jazeera television said coalition forces had struck radar installations at two air defense bases in eastern Libya late on Monday. However, a French armed forces spokesman said France, which has been involved in strikes in the east, had no planes in the air at the time.

In Misrata, residents said people had gone out into the streets to try to stop Gaddafi’s forces entering the city.

“When they gathered in the center the Gaddafi forces started shooting at them with artillery and guns,” said the resident, who gave his name as Saadoun. He said nine people were killed.

Zintan, near the Tunisian border, faced heavy shelling, two witnesses said, forcing residents to flee to mountain caves. Several houses were destroyed and a mosque minaret destroyed.

“New forces were sent today to besiege the city. There are now at least 40 tanks at the foothills of the mountains near Zintan,” Abdulrahmane Daw told Reuters by phone from the town.

The reports could not be independently verified.

DIPLOMATIC SETBACK

The United States has run into some criticism for the intensity of the firepower used on Libya, which included more than 110 Tomahawk missiles fired on Saturday.

Arab League chief Amr Moussa has questioned the methods used, while Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin compared the air campaign to “medieval crusades.”

President Barack Obama said the United States, which has been joined by Britain, France, Canada and Italy among others, planned to transfer the lead military role shortly. Britain and France led calls for the intervention.

“We anticipate this transition to take place in a matter of days and not in a matter of weeks,” Obama told a news conference during a visit to Chile.

Libyan rebels have welcomed the air strikes and say they are coordinating with the Western powers launching air strikes.

There was little sign at the vanguard of battle in east Libya that this communication extended to forward rebel units.

Western powers say they are not providing close air support to rebels or seeking to destroy Gaddafi’s army, but only protecting civilians, as their U.N. mandate allows, leaving disorganized rebel fighters struggling to make headway.

“If we don’t get more help from the West, Gaddafi’s forces will eat us alive,” rebel fighter Nouh Musmari told Reuters.

Security analysts say it is unclear what will happen if the Libyan leader digs in, especially since Western powers have made clear they would be unwilling to see Libya partitioned between a rebel-held east and Gaddafi-controlled west.

“There is still a real risk of a protracted stalemate, with neither side wanting to negotiate. So the endgame remains very unclear,” said Jeremy Binnie, a senior analyst with IHS Jane’s.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said the operation would not drag into another Iraq-style conflict.

“This is different to Iraq. This is not going into a country, knocking over its government and then owning and being responsible for everything that happens subsequently,” he said during a parliamentary debate on Libya.

“This is about protecting people and giving the Libyan people a chance to shape their own destiny.”

In an appearance on Libyan television on Sunday, Gaddafi promised his enemies a “long war.”

GADDAFI NOT A TARGET, WEST SAYS

Officials in Tripoli said one missile on Sunday, which they said was intended to kill Gaddafi, had destroyed a building in his compound, heavily bombed in 1986 by the United States.

“It was a barbaric bombing,” said government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim, showing pieces of shrapnel that he said came from the missile. “This contradicts American and Western (statements) … that it is not their target to attack this place.”

A Libyan government spokesman said foreign attacks had killed many people by bombing ports and Sirte airport.

“You saw that place (Sirte airport),” Mussa Ibrahim told a news conference. “It’s a civilian airport. It was bombarded and many people were killed. Harbours were also bombarded.”

Cameron said there were no plans to target Gaddafi. “The U.N. resolution is limited in its scope, it explicitly does not provide legal authority for action to bring about Gaddafi’s removal from power by military means,” he told parliament.

“We will help fulfill the U.N. Security Council (resolution), it is for the Libyan people to determine their government and their destiny, but our view is clear, there is no decent future for Libya with Colonel Gaddafi remaining in power.”

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said he hoped Libyans themselves would topple Gaddafi: “When will the regime collapse? It is quite possible that, given the weakness of the regime, it will break up from within.”

(Reporting by Mohammed Abbas and Angus MacSwan in Benghazi, Maria Golovnina and Michael Georgy in Tripoli, Hamid Ould Ahmed and Christian Lowe in Algiers; Tom Perry in Cairo, John Irish in Paris, Missy Ryan in Washington, Matt Spetalnick in Rio de Janeiro; Writing by Myra MacDonald; Editing by Andrew Dobbie)

Read this article:
Gunfire and explosions rock Tripoli for 3rd night
(Reuters)



Obama: U.S. to transfer control of Libya force in days (Reuters)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 21st, 2011 | Comments Off

SANTIAGO/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States will transfer control of the air assault on Libyan forces within days, President Barack Obama said on Monday, even as European divisions fueled speculation that U.S. leadership would continue.

Obama’s comments reflected a U.S. desire to have others be seen to lead the U.N.-mandated campaign. It has destroyed most of Muammar Gaddafi’s air defenses since it began last Saturday and is the third U.S.-led operation in a Muslim country in a decade.

“We anticipate this transition to take place in a matter of days and not in a matter of weeks,” Obama told a news conference during a visit to Chile.

“NATO will be involved in a coordinating function because of the extraordinary capacity of that alliance” but details of the transfer — when it would take place and to whom — would be provided by U.S. military chiefs, he said.

General Carter Ham, the U.S. commander now leading the offensive, said the missile strikes had crippled Gaddafi’s military prowess and set the stage for a broad no-fly zone stretching across most of northern Libya.

But as the days pass, doubts have been raised that the United States will be able to hand off control quickly, given Gaddafi’s defiance and differences within NATO about the alliance’s appropriate role in the Libya campaign.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said the intention was to transfer command to NATO but France said Arab countries did not want the U.S.-led alliance in charge.

Rifts are also growing in the international community over the campaign, which Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin compared to “medieval crusades.

Although Obama has called for Gaddafi to leave, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Libyans must ultimately determine his fate for themselves.

He said the U.S. military would soon pass command of the operation to allies. “While we have had a major role in the first two or three days, I expect us very soon to recede back into a supporting role,” Gates said during a visit to Russia.

‘TRULY A COALITION OPERATION’

Obama distinguished between the U.N.-backed military mission, to protect Libyan rebels and open routes for humanitarian help, from the longer-term U.S. policy goal, which was to see an end to Gaddafi’s four decades of rule.

The president, trying to balance the Libya crisis with his domestic priorities of jobs and economic recovery that are crucial to his chances for re-election in 2012, is facing criticism from both sides of the U.S. political spectrum.

Republican critics demand he clarify the goal of the Libya operation, saying he has done a poor job of articulating the mission to Americans. They portray it as an example of the president’s failure to lead.

Some of Obama’s fellow Democrats have expressed concern about entangling the United States in the North African country when its forces are already at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

U.S. officials have suggested NATO could help run the operation without formally taking on the campaign.

Andrew J. Bacevich, a professor of international relations at Boston University, said it would be difficult to stand up “on the fly” a multinational command structure for an evolving operation.

“If that’s what’s being attempted then the handoff may take longer than the Obama administration would like,” he said.

A senior U.S. military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said while the United States was hoping to hand off leadership once initial strikes conclude, it expects to continue to bear the burden for logistics and surveillance.

“It’s not just a British or French face on an American operation; it’s truly a coalition operation,” he said.

Even as the West presses the aerial campaign, the Pentagon said it was keeping Libyan rebels at arm’s length as it seeks to avoid getting mired in a messy civil conflict.

Ahmed El-Hasi, a spokesman for Libya’s February 17 opposition coalition, said rebels had coordinated with foreign powers on recent air strikes.

But Ham said no “official communication” had taken place and the coalition was not providing close air support to the rebels.

“Our mission is not to support any opposition forces so … there is no official communication or formal communication with those in this so-called opposition that are opposing the regime’s ground forces,” Ham told reporters at the Pentagon.

(Additional reporting by David Alexander, Caren Bohan and Steve Holland in Washington, David Brunnstrom in Brussels and Phil Stewart in St. Petersburg; Editing by David Storey)

See the original post here:
Obama: U.S. to transfer control of Libya force in days
(Reuters)



©
CyberChimps