Home » Posts tagged "News" (Page 2)

Posts Tagged ‘News’:


GOP 2012 hopefuls line up for Tea Party Summit (Exclusive to Yahoo! News)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 18th, 2011 | Comments Off

By Lindsey Boerma
National Journal

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty will join former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and businessman Herman Cain at a New Hampshire event next month hosted by the tea party-affiliated Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFPF).

Also invited, but not yet confirmed are former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., was invited, but his office “politely reminded us that he’s not running,” said AFPF New Hampshire State Director Corey Lewandowski.

Just as noteworthy are the contenders who didn’t make the cut at all, including Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., a tea party favorite.

“We’re not trying to exclude Michele Bachmann by any stretch of the imagination,” Lewandowski said. “What we did is we looked at the criteria of individuals back in December [when the invitations were sent] who had at least some media coverage as a potential candidate. It’s fair to say that at that point, Michele Bachmann … hadn’t had any serious press about that.”

(Encouraging signs for Obama in new poll)

Lewandowski said that because AFPF is limiting the forum to five possible White House hopefuls, the group may extend an invitation to Bachmann if the two remaining slots are not filled.

“We have to take the conversation about spending and job creation seriously,” he said. “And as you know, Michele Bachmann has become a huge part of that—she was here in New Hampshire last week. But it’s still not crystal clear where she’s going to be in one or two months.”

The event will also honor Ovide Lamontagne as AFPF’s “Conservative of the Year.” Lamontagne, a tea party favorite in his unsuccessful Senate bid last year, is positioning himself to be a kingmaker in New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary. He has opened his home to Santorum and Pawlenty as part of a presidential candidate series. He praised their outreach to the tea party as a smart political move.

(Can Democrats hold the Senate in 2012?)

“Pawlenty and Santorum are probably further along than anyone as far as campaigns,” Lamontagne told National Journal. “I think their personal calendars and campaign calendars are prompting them to get involved now, but as the tea party is organizing its supporters, a lot of candidates are going to be reaching out to them, and I respect that.”

While AFPF does not endorse candidates, the group is supported by the billionaire Koch brothers, whose underwriting of the tea party during the 2010 election cycle caused  critics to question the movement’s grassroots label.

Visit National Journal for more political news.



Diana’s dressmaker: Kate’s style will be different (AP)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 18th, 2011 | Comments Off

LONDON – Only a handful of insiders know which designer Kate Middleton has chosen to create her top-secret wedding gown, but at least one person — dressmaker Elizabeth Emanuel — understands what that person is going through.

The woman who co-designed the taffeta confection that Princess Diana wore in 1981 when she walked down the aisle to marry Prince Charles believes Middleton’s mystery designer is probably more than a bit anxious as the April 29 royal wedding approaches.

“I’m sure they are nervous now,” said Emanuel, relaxed and chatty in her central London studio, surrounded by mannequins wearing dramatic handmade wedding gowns. “It’s such a big event, with billions watching, you cannot make mistakes. There is no second chance, it has to be perfect.”

Emanuel and her ex-husband David triumphed in their own pressure-packed moment, coming up with a showstopping gown that transformed Diana from a little-known nursery school teacher into a glamorous princess. The dress was groundbreaking for its tight bodice, cinched waist and what seemed like miles and miles of taffeta, silk and lace.

Rosemary Harden, director of the Fashion Museum in Bath, England, said the dress set trends throughout the globe.

“It definitely set the tone for 15 to 20 years,” said Harden. “It was something everyone remarked upon — it took people’s breath away. It was the archetypal fairy princess dress, with an incredible quantity of beautiful fabric and beautiful silk and that long train.”

Harden said the tight bodice, puffed sleeves and very full skirt Diana favored eventually fell out of style as strapless wedding gowns came in — and she believes styles will change again once Middleton’s dress is unveiled.

There have been leaks suggesting that Sarah Burton, creative director of the Alexander McQueen house, is designing the dress, but she has denied the reports — though some believe she may be covering up her involvement to maintain secrecy.

Middleton, with her long, lean figure, has likely chosen a classic design with some distinctive “edgy” detailing or feature to make the gown memorable, Emanuel predicted. She thinks Middleton may wear her long hair swept up, while other fashion figures have suggested Middleton should let it cascade to her shoulders as it usually does.

The designer, whose long career has encompassed making outfits for stage and screen, does not expect Middleton’s dress to resemble Diana’s. The two brides are very different: Diana was still in her teens when she married, and she had not yet plunged into the fashion world. Middleton is 29 and has developed her own style, which emphasizes her slender figure, pale skin, and dark brown hair.

Fashions have changed as well, with softer fabrics like tulle and organza more popular in gowns than the stiffer taffeta used in Diana’s dress. There also may be fewer frills, and less volume in the skirt.

“It was perfect for the ’80s, but not for today,” Emanuel said of her most famous work, which is often on public display at Althorp House, Diana’s ancestral home, or touring museums throughout the world.

Emanuel thinks Middleton’s designer has moved beyond the planning phase and is now cutting the actual fabric in a nerve-wracking, unforgiving process that can become quite expensive if an error is made and some of the pricey material ruined.

Emanuel remembers her own time in the spotlight as a blur. She and David worked around the clock, even making the bridesmaids’ dresses and backup gowns for emergency use by Diana in case the press discovered the real design ahead of time.

They were so worried that something might go wrong that they made an “overskirt” that could be worn on top of the real skirt in case someone accidentally spilled juice or coffee on Diana as she was dressing for the ceremony.

There were endless fittings with the incredible shrinking bride — Diana lost so much weight in the weeks before the ceremony that the designers had to make several successively smaller bodices. She had a 23-inch waist by her wedding day.

Emanuel, 57, said as the wedding date neared she started to worry that the gown’s 25-foot (7.6-meter) train would separate from the rest of the dress as Diana entered St. Paul’s Cathedral. She feared she would be remembered as the woman who designed the dress that fell apart.

Emanuel used safety pins, hooks and stitches to secure the train and make sure calamity didn’t strike.

“We made a parasol in case it rained,” she said. “Actually two: one ivory, one white, so the umbrella maker wouldn’t know the color of the dress.”

Sounds a bit paranoid? Not really. She remembers reporters constantly begging her for information, making up sob stories about how they would be fired if they didn’t find out details about the dress.

That was in the quaint, pre-Internet era. Today, Emanuel said, the pressure is even more intense and the need for secrecy even higher because anyone with a camera phone could flummox the palace’s best laid plans if they get a shot of Middleton entering a design salon for a gown fitting.

Regardless of the designer, Emanuel believes the fittings are taking place at one of the royal palaces in a secure environment, because the design studios are likely staked out by the ultra-competitive British press.

But why hasn’t the name leaked out? Why hasn’t the designer boasted to his or her partner, who told the dentist or the school teacher, with the whispered warning not to pass it on, starting a chain reaction that ends with the designer’s identity on the front page of tabloids?

Emanuel said it hasn’t happened because it’s in everyone’s interest to maintain secrecy so that Middleton can surprise fiance Prince William — and the world — on their wedding day. Keeping the design out of the news is an important part of the royal wedding gown commission, she said.

“It’s got to be a surprise, that’s the whole thing,” Emanuel said. “Bit by bit, all the details of the wedding are being released, and that’s the last thing, and everyone wants to know.”

She had faith that the designer — expected to be British — will engineer a showstopper.

“I’m sure it will be a fantastic surprise when she gets out of the car; that’s what everyone’s waiting for,” she said.

See more here:
Diana’s dressmaker: Kate’s style will be different
(AP)



House votes to cut funding to public radio

Published by in Uncategorized on March 17th, 2011 | Comments Off

By Wendell Marsh

WASHINGTON |
Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:20pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The House of Representatives voted Thursday to end federal funding for National Public Radio, following recent controversies that entangled some of the organization’s senior executives.

Republicans said the move, which passed by a vote of 228-192, was motivated by the need to cut spending in the face of a record federal budget deficit.

Democrats argued the bill was a thinly veiled ideological attack on an institution that some Republicans have long criticized for what they see as its liberal bias.

The measure’s prospects beyond the Republican-led House appear doubtful as Democrats control the Senate and President Barack Obama, who opposed the bill, could veto it.

NPR, which has about 27 million listeners, was shaken last week when its chief executive, Vivian Schiller, resigned after the organization’s chief fund-raiser was secretly videotaped making disparaging remarks about members of the conservative Tea Party movement and questioning whether NPR needed government funding.

The organization also aroused the anger of conservative media and Republican critics last year when it abruptly fired news analyst Juan Williams after he made controversial comments about Muslims.

Only about 2 percent of NPR’s budget comes from the federal government. But its member stations are heavily reliant on funding from federal and state governments.

NPR said it was concerned about the impact the bill would have on the entire public radio system.

“The bill is a direct effort to weaken public radio that would ultimately choke local stations’ ability to serve their audiences,” NPR said in a statement. “Many small-budget stations would be placed in a serious financial bind.”

Under the House-passed bill, affiliate stations could not use federal funds to pay for NPR-produced programs or member dues. Republicans said the measure would save up to $60 million a year.

“It’s called tightening the belt,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said on the floor. “It’s time to reflect the common sense of the American people.”

Democratic defenders of NPR said many of its programs had little or no ideological content, and that conservative and Republican criticism was less about making its political tone balanced than tilting it to the right.

“My colleagues should consider the studies that show NPR listeners are more aware of indisputable facts than listeners of most other news sources. … Where’s the political bias?” asked Democratic Representative Mike Doyle.

(Reporting by Wendell Marsh; Editing by Peter Cooney and Todd Eastham)

Originally posted here:



Pakistan cricket trio face British trial on May 20 (AFP)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 17th, 2011 | Comments Off

LONDON (AFP) – Three Pakistan cricketers accused of spot-fixing in a Test match against England last year were on Thursday ordered to stand trial in a British court on May 20.

Former captain Salman Butt and fast bowlers Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Aamer appeared at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court for the first time since they were charged with conspiracy to cheat and conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments.

District Judge Howard Riddle said the allegations against the players and their agent, Mazhar Majeed, were “very serious”.

“On the face of it, there is clear evidence against all of you in varying degrees,” he said.

The judge ordered all four men to report for trial at Southwark Crown Court in London.

The players, who all live in Pakistan, were granted unconditional bail, while the Britain-based Majeed was freed on condition he surrender his passport and does not apply for international travel documents.

The players and their agent were charged after being questioned by detectives over accusations in the News of the World newspaper that no-balls were deliberately bowled in the fourth Test match at Lord’s last August.

Prosecutor Sally Walsh said all four men were accused of having “conspired together and with others unknown for £150,000 ($240,000) as inducement or reward to bowl three no-balls at the fourth Test”.

She told the court the three players were accused of bowling the three no-balls “for the purpose of enabling another to cheat at gambling”.

The charges carry “the risk of imprisonment”, she added.

Prior knowledge of when no-balls will occur in an innings could be exploited by gamblers in what is known as spot-betting, which is hugely popular in South Asia.

The players were greeted by a scrum of photographers as they arrived at the court.

Dressed in suits and open-necked shirts, the four men spoke only to confirm their names as they appeared in the glass-fronted dock.

An International Cricket Council (ICC) anti-corruption tribunal has already banned the three players over the allegations.

Butt received a 10-year ban with five years suspended, Asif was barred for seven years with two suspended and 18-year-old Aamer was banned for five years.

Aamer’s lawyer, Gareth Peirce, explained that her client, a rising star of the game until the accusations derailed his career, still lived with his parents in the Pakistani city of Lahore and that he was his family’s main bread-winner.

“His whole future depends upon this matter being resolved,” said Peirce.

The players looked relaxed at the start of the hearing, but were glum-faced as the trial date was set.

All three players deny the allegations and have already filed appeals against their bans at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne.

Read the original:
Pakistan cricket trio face British trial on May 20
(AFP)



Release of CIA contractor prompts Pakistan clashes (AP)

Published by in Uncategorized on March 16th, 2011 | Comments Off

LAHORE, Pakistan – Police fired tear gas against protesters burning tires outside a U.S. consulate in Pakistan after the release of a CIA contractor who killed two Pakistani men.

The clashes Wednesday in Lahore involved around 200 people. There were small protests in other main cities as well.

Police made several arrests in Lahore and struck other people with batons, according to witnesses.

Raymond Allen Davis was released earlier Wednesday after the United States paid $2.3 million in “blood money” to the victims’ families, a lawyer for the families has said.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.

LAHORE, Pakistan (AP) — A CIA contractor who shot and killed two Pakistani men was freed from prison on Wednesday after the United States paid $2.34 million in “blood money” to the victims’ families, Pakistani officials said, defusing a dispute that had strained ties between Washington and Islamabad.

In what appeared to be carefully choreographed end to the diplomatic crisis, the U.S. Embassy said the Justice Department had opened an investigation into the killings on Jan. 27 by Raymond Allen Davis. It thanked the families for “their generosity” in pardoning Davis, but did not mention any money changing hands.

The killings and detention of Davis triggered a fresh wave of anti-American sentiment in Pakistan and were testing an alliance seen as key to defeating al-Qaida and ending the war in Afghanistan.

The tensions were especially sharp between the CIA and Pakistan’s powerful Inter Services Intelligence Agency, which says it did not know Davis was operating in the country. One ISI official said it had backed the “blood money” deal. There appeared to be little public backlash as night fell in Pakistan.

Davis claimed he acted in self-defense when he killed the two men on the street in the eastern city of Lahore.

The United States had insisted Davis was covered by diplomatic immunity, but the weak government here, facing intense pressure from Islamist parties, sections of the media and the general public, refused to acknowledge the protection.

The payment of “blood money”, sanctioned under Pakistani law, had been suggested as the best way to end the dispute.

Given the high stakes for both nations, few imagined either side would allow it to derail the relationship. The main question was how long it would take to reach a deal.

Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah said Davis was charged with murder Wednesday in a court that was convened in a prison in Lahore, but was immediately pardoned by the families of the victims after the payment.

Reporters were not allowed to witness the proceedings.

“This all happened in court and everything was according to law,” he said. “The court has acquitted Raymond Davis. Now he can go anywhere.”

Raja Muhammad Irshad, a laywer for the families, said 19 male and female relatives appeared in court to accept the money.

He said each told the court “they were ready to accept the blood money deal without pressure and would have no objection if the court acquitted Raymond Davis.”

Representatives of the families had previously said they would refuse any money.

Some media reports said the some of the families had been given permission to live in the United States.

Irshad said that was not discussed in court.

The case dominated headlines and television shows in Pakistan, with pundits using it to whip up hatred against the already unpopular United States. While the case played out in court, many analysts said that the dispute was essentially one between the CIA and the ISA, and that they would need to resolve their differences before Davis could be freed.

One ISI official said CIA director Leon Panetta and ISI chief Gen. Shuja Pasha talked in mid-February to smooth out the friction between the two spy agencies. A U.S. official confirmed that the phone call took place.

Pasha demanded the U.S. identify “all the Ray Davises working in Pakistan, behind our backs,” the official said.

He said Panetta agreed “in principle” to declare such employees, the official said, but would not confirm if the agency had done so.

A second ISI official said as a result of that conversation the ISI — which along with the army is a major power center in the country — then backed an effort to help negotiate the “blood money.” The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not allowed to give their names to the media.

___

Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier in Kabul, Munir Ahmed and Zarar Khan in Islamabad and Adam Goldman in Washington contributed to this report.

Read the original:
Release of CIA contractor prompts Pakistan clashes
(AP)



©
CyberChimps